I love
“eclectic”. Which is to say, I hate
“eclectic”…the word, at any rate. The concept of eclectic—namely the canny
blending of material, era, style, provenance, colour and scale (to name only a
few)—still delights me no end. It is the great melting pot of the design world.
But that word—that poor, hackneyed,
misused word! In some ways I view it with the same apprehension some senior
citizens regard the term ‘gay’; that’s not to say I’m in agreement with them,
just that I know what it’s like to mourn a word. Common wisdom dictates if you
love something you should set it free, and that’s precisely what I plan on
doing with those eight particular letters.
So what do you
do when the one term meant to serve one purpose falls down on the job? You
consult a thesaurus (“catholic” came up!) and then you improvise. I have
substituted “curated” before, as in a curated room versus an eclectic one. At
times this has proven to be a serviceable option; at others I choke on the sheer
pretentiousness of it. Ask me to give “quirky” a whirl and I may well have a
seizure on the spot.
A reasonable
person might wonder what exactly happened to eclectic that made me hate it so.
The short answer? It got hijacked by bad people. Well, perhaps not bad people but ones who are more often
than not tedious and misguided. To be fair, this is an affliction of our modern
era—or at least something that has occurred with greater frequency since we all
wound up with specialty television channels numbering in the hundreds.
Getting back to
my initial point, though, I do love
an eccentric assemblage of items that seem not to be driven by reason—or any
other governing principle for that matter.
They always are, of course,
but not in a way that loudly declares its intent—and they are distinguished by
being the refreshing antithesis of matchy-matchy (more on that in another
post).
Real artistry is
all about the blend, be it pigments in paint, flavours in food, gestures in
dance or furniture in a room. With a deft hand the results are
marvellous—marvel-worthy for the simple fact that the nuances that make them
successful are always more intuitive than identified. Much like old Hollywood
sets, no one wants to see—or know about—the brackets propping them; they only
care about the magic that is created because of them. Good design can be
analysed with a cold eye but the most successful examples don’t invite such
scrutiny, just the desire to accept and enjoy what has been wrought.
I find that,
these days, eclectic seems to be a catch-all term for thrown-together, which
suggests haste and a lack of care. You throw a salad together—you do not treat
a space and the objects that dwell within it with such callous indifference. I
find this not dissimilar to when you were a child and your parents tossed you
into a room with someone else’s horrible children and expected you to play
together just because you just happened to be roughly the same age. Ugh. That
to me is as forced and wrong-headed as putting a velvet Elvis painting over a
Biedermeier chest and declaring it “wacky”. Again: ugh!
A perfect
example of the abuse that has so compromised eclectic can be found in the
behaviour of a peripheral acquaintance. Her modus
operandi is to snap up whatever
happens to be on sale, toss it all into a room regardless of suitability, and
then rationalize the crime she has perpetrated by saying the look is
“eclectic”. I’m not sure how one’s perception moves from bargain basement to
eclectic in such circumstances, but there you have it. I am always slightly
embarrassed when this ersatz curator invites me to view the results, something
akin to the feeling I get when I encounter a sheepish-looking dog who has been
dressed up by its owner….
At its noblest,
eclecticism is the opposite of “thrown-together”; it’s about careful
consideration and intent. Love plays a significant role here, too. The crème of the design world frequently espouse the notion that if you truly love the items
you’re working with they will
love one another in
return. Or, more simply put, just
work. True, it might take a bit of fiddling to get these arranged marriages
just right but oftentimes that ‘love’ will show itself in line, balance and
proportion. Even when such fundamentals are at odds the tension they create
offers a refreshing challenge to our perception, not to mention frequent
moments of delight.
What I always
try to do—and what I think we all strive for in the name of feathering our
nests—is create those moments of delight, enduring ones which speak to us on a
daily basis and never fail to engage visitors to our homes. Perhaps that is where the compass points us next, not
necessarily away from eclectic (still a functional word, to be sure) but more so
towards the creation of circumstantial delight.
Perhaps all eclectic and I need is a brief cooling off period—a trial
separation, if you will, in order to gain perspective on what really matters.
After all, what could matter more in these short lives of ours than delight?